• FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Just to clarify for everyone, only this clown’s DLSS 3 mod (3 as in frame generation) is paywalld. His dlss 2 mod (2 as in normal dlss) is free on nexus.

    Also to all the mental gymnasts trying to justify this horse shit, remember, the patreon sub is $5/MONTH. This means if you buy 1 month at $5 to download the mod, and the author “conveniently” comes out with an update one month later, you need to subscibe for another $5. So basically it’s a fucking subscription for a god damn dlss 3 mod. You know the author is milking this bullshit to keep subscibers and keep his income flowing. Marty mcfly does the same fucking dogshit with his stupid ass RTGI reshade shaders. Fuck that shit. Those people can go get fucked.

    • forgotaboutlaye@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Does this type of mod break with updates, or could you potentially just stay on the version you downloaded and forego any updates? I don’t mod much to the point where I’ve paid for any, but curious the requisite of ongoing subscription for this type of thing.

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s a good question. I’m not sure but I’d assume it would break with updates. I was thinking more about just updates the author makes to make the mod better. Likely he’ll keep working on making it better but you can bet your booty thay he’ll keep making minor updates once a month to milk his subsciber’s money. Patreon is a fucking scam.

    • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That McFly guy has been riding the “It’ll be released soon™” train for something like five years at this point.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      DLSS 3 is way better than 2, so I pirated the shit out of that mod. Frame Generation is a game changer. It’s like a magic button that gives you an extra 30-60 FPS for free. Never understood the hate.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        DLSS 3 is far worse than DLSS 2 IMO.

        There’s basically zero disadvantage to turning on DLSS 2. Most of the time you cannot or can barely tell the difference.

        DLSS 3 introduces lots of artifacting, some frames straight up look like DALL-E image, it adds input lag, and it needs you to already have a high framerate to start with to make it bearable, text in particular gets mangled by it.

        Fast paced games and games that rely on quick reactions are a no-go for DLSS 3. It’s suitable for games like MS flight sim where adding input lag doesn’t really matter and there’s not rapid movement.

      • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why do people hate on it? I thought ot was pretty clear that it’s great. Unfortunately i can’t use it since I have a 3080.

        • Pixel of Life@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s great if you have a decent framerate to start with, but it really struggles at lower framerates and you’ll get a lot of ugly artifacts if there’s any rapid movement on screen.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          An alternative mod that does the same thing is on the* Nexus now; you no longer need to pirate anything. Just download that.

    • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Okay but Martys RTGI is great and works in quite alot of games without much tinkering (just need to access depth buffer), don’t mind paying for it. Useally sub and let it expire once every few years.

      • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        “I don’t mind buying my own painting and then paying monthly for it to have some details filled in that eventually get painted over anyway at some rate”

        Is it morally wrong to have someone spy on the detail painter and copy their techniques? (In this metaphor techniques are DLSS implementation, not the paint (DLSS itself))

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Personally I find it hard to care as I won’t be playing the game for longer then a month anyhow. That said, real easy to wait for someone else to drop a dlss3 mod or just go without.

    • Squander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wouldnt be surprised if his patreon gets hacked or at least a cease and desist.

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      What do you mean you don’t wanna pay for shit I didn’t pay for either, and do so on a monthly basis??

      I should be allowed to freely profit off someone else’s work because I put some amount of personally chosen free time into my modifications and therefor should have power over the consumer and the original producer!!

      Oink Oink!

  • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    10 months ago

    Out of this whole thing, I just want to say something about this.

    Some players’ reactions to the paywall have been unfavorable; they think that charging for mods is unethical and goes against the spirit of community modification

    Everyone needs to make bread. Someone asking for money from their mod or map or whatever isn’t against any spirit. It’s just a human being asking to make bread. Now some don’t agree with the price tag and that’s fine.

    But we all need to recognize humans asking for some dough for their hard work is in the spirit of existing. Some folk do it for free just for the feelings and we love ‘em for it. But those asking for some cash are no different.

    This world is already full of dog eat dog. Let’s not hate on someone just trying to get through it. You don’t have to pay the ask, but let’s not go making enemies just cause we don’t agree on that number on the price tag.

    • Mini_Moonpie@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I am not disagreeing with the premise that it’s fair for someone to be paid for their work. However, during the Skyrim paid mod controversy (on Steam), I learned that there a lot of situations where having paid mods did hurt the modding community and created ethical concerns.

      • Mods were being stolen and sold by people that were not the actual mod authors.
      • Mods were being sold that depended on larger, more complicated mods to function, but the payment was not shared with the larger mod.
      • Mods that had multiple contributors were being sold by an individual who was not sharing the money with the other contributors.
      • Players were concerned about being asked to pay for bug fix mods when the developer should be fixing their own game. This is of course, was not the modders fault and does not mean their bug fix mod wasn’t valuable or deserving of pay, but many felt the developer should pay for it, not users.

      I would also point out that it wasn’t just greedy players that complained about paid mods - a lot of modders thought it went against the spirit of modding because of how it harmed collaboration in the community. Suddenly, they couldn’t trust that others would not steal their work or profit from it unfairly. And, that seems like a reasonable take to me, given all the abuses that modders claimed happened in the short time that paid modding was a thing for Skyrim on Steam.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        It feels like the issue is that it was offering the convenience of payment to mods, but not really thinking about the necessary friction of assuring licenses/legality/etc. All of that CAN, of course, be an issue for cheap Unity games too. I remember back when Steam Greenlight started, they required each game to donate $100 to charity to even be considered, basically placing a bet of assurance that it wasn’t a stolen asset flip (I don’t know if they still do that).

        • Mini_Moonpie@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think you’re exactly right - it is the combination of money + little oversight that is the big problem. Warframe seems to do a good job with tennogen but they limit it to only cosmetic mods and seem to be pretty restrictive about what they accept into their store. I don’t see how you could have good oversight for a game with as many mods as something like Skyrim has.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s not “oversight”, but if a modder needs to create their own storefront and Paypal integration, and advertising through word of mouth and their own social contacts (as in this case it seems), then that’s going to offer a lot more scrutiny than a low-effort asset flipper presenting themselves anonymously through Steam’s given storefront.

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      You don’t go into modding for the money. It’s like making a non profit for the money. That’s why they’re getting backlash, they’re asking money where money’s not supposed to be involved.

      • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        it’s like theyre making a non profit for the money, except the without the making a non profit part

      • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        This is such a shitty attitude 🤣

        God forbid we pay for a fucking cup of coffee because that person should want to work for free. This is the same bullshit as “work hard play hard” and “we are family here”. Might as well start telling modders it’s not about the pay, it’s the people and experience we’re paying you in. Rent what’s that?

        You are all on a lemmy instance after 2 months of non stop bitching about non paid reddit moderators. Make up your damn mind.

        • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yes, again you don’t mod for the money. If you’re looking for that, you can create your own software. Other people in this thread made other good points, and this guy was trying to make a dlss mod subscription based, so fuck that guy. It’s literally better if the mod doesn’t exist in that case. Like I said with my analogy, it’s like trying to create a non-profit for the profit. There’s a million other avenues available to them if they want money. Especially because they are basing their work off of other’s work whom are not getting paid, yet they are?

          Also idk what you’re talking about with the mod stuff but I do think it’s dumb internet janitors do work for free lol, and they do it for power. I don’t think they should be paid either.

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Remember, the patreon sub is $5/MONTH. This means if you buy 1 month at $5 to download the mod, and the author “conveniently” comes out with an update one month later, you need to subscibe for another $5. So basically it’s a fucking subscription for a god damn dlss 3 mod. You know the author is milking this bullshit to keep subscibers and keep his income flowing. Marty mcfly does the same fucking dogshit with his stupid ass RTGI reshade shaders. Fuck that shit. Those people can go get fucked.

      If you want to charge $5 or $10 for your time spent making the mod, fine, whatever. But if you are trying to make it a subscription model then I have ZERO sympathy for you.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ultimately, the guy is being upfront with his pricing and what he’s asking for. What’s the reason to hate on him? Either it’s worth it at that price or it’s not.

        • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          So you’re invalidating the feeling of being upset when something that used to be free (modding games) is no longer free. Modding has always been a free hobby that was run by good-willed pc gamers. Now monetization is fragmenting and ruining the modding experience.

          You’re also justifying paying a subsciption on top of a fucking $70 game. Do you rip up a $5 bill every time you take a shit? Try it out. You may enjoy it.

          • wahming@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            No, I’d just choose not to use it and move on. Or if I’m broke and really wanted it, sure, pirate it. Not act like an entitled brat and whine and moan and it

          • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            they cant invalidate the feeling of being upset when something that used to be free (modding games) is no longer free

            modding games is still free, so your feeling of being upset wasnt valid in the first place

    • UlrikHD@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The game has just launched and the mod had been released and cracked already. This isn’t about making bread, it’s clearly a trivial hack for him to do, not something that requires full time job maintenence.

      People spend hundreds of hours modding free of charge, what he does is a joke in comparison if we are talking about lost time that could have been spent earning money. The groundwork was made by Bethesda, AMD and Nvidia.

    • avonarret1@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      The reason why he charges does not matter at all. Anyone wanting a service for free is not in the position to demand anything. Would it be nice to get stuff for free? Sure! But demanding free service and badmouthing if you don’t get it? Fuck off.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      For real. You want it for free? Cool go ahead and make the mod yourself. All the tools are there. Wait, you don’t want to spend your time learning to code? You don’t want to spend your time learning modding tools. Our time is our most finite resource and you get mad when someone asks for something in return for theirs? People are just up their own asses.

  • borth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    The modder also locked the DLSS3 mod behind a paywall, and players also pirated that 🤣

  • ericflo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dude can charge whatever he wants, and you can choose to buy it or not. Super weird and annoying responses here.

    • Saneless@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh man, I saw a 2,000 word rant about it on Reddit. Just such whining

      As if the dude would have bothered to do it for free? Likely not.

      Pay, or don’t, and then reevaluate all the things you do for free and if you have room to stand

    • OneClappedCheek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a 1 time $5 fee. People are just mad that they’re broke after buying a 4090. Frustrations should be aimed at Nvidia, not this one dude trying to make a buck

  • Graphine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t have a problem with some mods being sold. My issue is when you price it initially for free and THEN decide later to charge money for it. That’s within your rights of course, but don’t expect people to not get pissed off enough to pirate it.

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    Okay is gamescensor written by actual people, or just some generative learning SEO site? Because wow this is a mess of an article.

    The mod replaces the FSR2 upscaling technology included in the game (which is made for AMD graphics cards)

    FSR2 works on every major graphics card

    a more modern upscaler that is compatible with more recent Nvidia cards.

    Wat?

    PureDark, who claimed to make more than $40,000

    Nope some one else extrapolated that data from a patreon page.

    It may be because AMD is “Starfield’s exclusive PC partner” and only supports FSR2 technology at launch that the game only does so.

    Wat again?!?

  • TheBlue22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    I understand when massive, dlc sized mods are monetized. Not when small ones are.

    For example in minecraft, there was a mod with which you could pregenerate your world before making it. The creator decided to gut it and put all the good features behind his patreon.

    • hyper@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean at the end of the day its the decision of the developer who put time in it… if you’re not happy with that look for another mod or code your own.
      Sure I appreciate free mods but we shouldn’t take them for granted.

  • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    ITT: A gross misunderstanding about how mod and DLSS/RTX licencing works.

    Folks act like modding is a constitutional right and not expressly allowed within TOS. Guys of Bethesda wanted to go full on piss on the community they could shut all of it MPAA style. They choose to let modders use and monitize their assets because it’s less expensive and harmful then attacking everyone e.g Nintendo. https://documents.bethesda.net/en/terms-of-service

    RTX is fully redistributable without modification as long as it’s used on Nvidia hardware.

    https://developer.nvidia.com/downloads/nvidia-rtx-sdks-license-23jan2023pdf#:~:text=Further%2C the DLSS SDK and,DLSS SDK and NGX SDK.

    • FluorideMind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      They choose to do that because the community caries their games. I wouldn’t own a single beth game if they didn’t have mod support.

      • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        And? I’m just informing everyone bitching about the legal issues who lack a fundamental understanding of the aforementioned documents.

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      ITT: Bitching “the old ways were better” user clearly doesn’t understand the hipocricy of charging for mods when devs didn’t pay for access themselves.

      What you get to be the only person who profits? Not the companies who made the rest of the fucking game so you can copy and paste some fucking stackoverflow implementation posts?

      Dev needs to get real - enjoy that bite in your ass. Fees for thee but not for me

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lazy game devs should release finished optimized products.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      How to say you know nothing about game development without saying you know nothing about game (software) development. But want to assert your opinion on it regardless.

      It’s corporate profiteering not lazy devs. The devs work their asses off, these aren’t their decisions to make.

      It’s like blaming the guy finishing the drywall for design problems with the building. Lazy drywallers, ruining a good office tower, it wouldn’t be leaning if they weren’t so lazy.

      • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The more people defend the lazy game devs, the more crappy half finished games we will get. The reason people need to seek out upscaling at all for Starfield is because the game isn’t optimized. Lazy design.

        • Daevan@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Or bad resource allocation by the management. If they cut performance development in favour of marketing what a developer can do?

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I like that you are so unwilling to learn that you associate an explanation of a field you know nothing about as “defending”

          😂😂

  • Entropy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    This isn’t anything new, there’s some community software locked behind paywalls like patreon already. Doesn’t mean we have to like it though.

    Then again, DLSS is an nvidia product, so there’s a legal issue here I think.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Imagine putting a mod that the devs of the game it’s for can take down at any moment if they feel like it.

    Imagine being dumb enough to pay for it as well!

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    PureDark, who claimed to make more than $40,000 per month from locking DLSS3 mods behind their Patreon page,

    Make that 50k, his current patreon page shows over 10k members. There’s stuff for several games there, tho, like RDR2, Last of Us 2, Elden Ring, Fallout 4, etc.

    Seems there’s plenty of space for competitors to enter the “offer DLSS mods for games that don’t have it”

    If I was earning that much per month, I wouldn’t worry about taking extra time to add DRM to my stuff. Despite the cracked version floating around, he got more subscribers since the first stories came around and he’s at zero risk of suffering any significant loss. Pirate that shit with a clean conscience