[photo above] Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu watches a video showing the launch of an Arrow 3 hypersonic anti-ballistic missile. The war against Gaza is using up weapons stockpiles fast. | Menahem Kahana/Pool via AP

  • uphillbothways@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This is so fucking disgusting. We ought to be tarring and feathering these execs and their largest investors, then taking their wealth for the public benefit.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do you think that if the US stopped making weapons then everyone else would also just stop?

        • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          He makes a good point. The only way to solve it is to use all our weapons at once on the enemy destroying their weapons. Then when we run out they run out too so no one can fight anymore. Solved.

          • Fraylor@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            He makes a lazy, stupid non point. “Well this red herring should be enough to keep people from changing anything.”

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      It goes back further than that. Major General Smedley Butler wrote a book on it, “War is a Racket”, back in 1935 - and I’m pretty sure he wasn’t the first, either.

        • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’re so right.

          Eisenhower: “people, hear my warning or this terrible thing will happen”

          Bastards: “He’s right, we can get rich from making that bad thing he’s warning about happen.”

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes, because that’s the whole point of war. Always has been. There might be a tangled web of parties involved, but money is always the consistent thread through it all.

    Heavily decorated veteran Major General Smedley Butler was campaigning about this nearly 100 years ago.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        People have been campaigning for peace in the Palestine region for longer than anyone’s been alive. It’s just that people pushing for war, driven by profit, have been far more effective.

        What’s interesting to look at, I think, is how restraint has been developed over the years. WW1 and WW2 were no doubt a big boon for the war industry, but at the same time because war was everywhere it had plenty of negative effects on the manufacturers and dealers themselves. Now, manufacturing and selling is kept safely away from the actual war itself.

        • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You can make money from weapons without having to use them. For example if I had an a-bomb on a dead man’s switch I could walk around making all sorts of crazy demands much like countries do and no one has had to use one since shortly after they were invented. Your neighbours knowing you’re armed to the teeth will have an impact on their behaviour and you don’t have to fire a single bullet. Admittedly once you have full stockpiles of ammo you don’t need to buy until you start using it. I think this is why so much goes into r and d too keep it as a psychological deterrent for your enemies.

          Sorry I just read the context of this reply. Clearly Israel’s enemy don’t give a shit what kind of weapons they have

    • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Any product fabrication is so much more than the actual product. For a weapon you need steel, machinery, oil etc. Technically the petrol station near the factory also profits from the weapon factory. Where do you draw the line who can profit from it? Until it is legal to produce any weapon someone somewhere in the chain will profit from it. In a capitalist setting this cannot just vanish.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The part where I’m talking about targeting is manufacture and development. It’s not realistic to penalize steel and petrol and other materials because that gets too messy and complicated.

        Weapons should be manufactured only by one’s government for express use in defense. No one should get paid more than a modest salary (something fair for their labor; I hadn’t given it thought enough to say more than that at this time), no one in charge should make huge salaries or bonuses, it should be a thing people do because it pays rather than because of enrichment. Like how no one gets massively wealthy delivering mail or hauling garbage; sure, you can do quite well in some instances, but you’re doing it to put food on the table rather than to gain power.

        Sorry that I haven’t more developed thoughts at this moment. But something roughly resembling this is what I had in mind when I posted the prior comment.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Your tax dollars at work. Fuck you if you have student loans, we’d rather spend our money making our shareholders rich though genocide.

  • JayK117@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Hey Bob, you taking part of the wholesale slaughter of innocent people for fun and profit today?”, “Ha ha, you know it!” /s

  • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Obvious statement is obvious.

    Fun fact: when countries use weapons to blow each other up, whomever is left always wants to buy more weapons.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Across the entire Raytheon portfolio, you’re going to see a benefit of this restocking,” he told shareholders.

    Reads like a cringy villian in a sci-fi movie

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really doubt it. Ukraine will use much more ordinance than Isreal ever will. But, anything to get more money from the rubes.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    8 months ago

    Really it’s Hamas’s war on the Palestinians and Israelis, funded by Netanyahu. Hamas has been e.g. shooting Palestinian civilians who want to leave the front lines – the kind of thing Russia does to its draftees.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hamas has been e.g. shooting Palestinian civilians who want to leave the front lines

      Do you have any credible reports of this?

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          An audio recording from an Israeli HUMINT division, the kind that exists to create and spread propaganda. Reminds me of the recording the IDF released of Hamas members admitting the hospital strike was their own, which according to many impartial people featured them speaking the wrong dialect and in the wrong accent.

          • jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            🤷

            All photos, videos, audio recordings, and testimonies, can be faked, manipulated or be a lie. What’s “credible” at this point?

            Some outlets published a video of that missile, with a trail coming from inside Gaza. Some have published the IDF’s photos with missile trajectories on them. Some have shown air photos of cars blocking the road “from North to South” Gaza. Some have published videos of missile impacts in the South. Some people have claimed to have gone South, only to get bombed and run back North.

            This is war.

            In the Ukrainian war, we still don’t have a credible source as to who blew up Nord Stream, and that’s been over a year ago already.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              In the Ukrainian war, we still don’t have a credible source as to who blew up Nord Stream, and that’s been over a year ago already.

              Supposedly it was done by pro-Ukrainian forces, not specifically Ukraine themselves but possibly some mercenary group, possibly even the US. It’s kind of been brushed under the rug as otherwise it would damage support for Ukraine.

    • TinyPizza@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      What front lines? The whole of Gaza is encircled and the air strikes are occurring everywhere.