CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agoLasers won’t make noise and aren’t moving a physical mass that would create sound as it passes by.sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1197arrow-down140
arrow-up1157arrow-down1imageLasers won’t make noise and aren’t moving a physical mass that would create sound as it passes by.sh.itjust.worksCDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareKalothar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-27 months agoHow does this tactic work when counting for light machine guns? specifically a SAW or 240B. Which as I understand is the largest enemy casualty producing weapon carried by a U.S. army member. I don’t know if it really counts as suppressive fire or just overwhelming fire power at that point
minus-squareskulblaka@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 months agoThose are more of an area denial weapon. Less “suppressing fire” and more “oppressing fire”
How does this tactic work when counting for light machine guns?
specifically a SAW or 240B. Which as I understand is the largest enemy casualty producing weapon carried by a U.S. army member.
I don’t know if it really counts as suppressive fire or just overwhelming fire power at that point
Those are more of an area denial weapon. Less “suppressing fire” and more “oppressing fire”