This is a reminder that you must be at least 18 years old to access Lemmy World per their Terms of Service (ToS). Additionally, as moderators of this community, we are obliged to report violations of this rule, so we will have to report it to the admin team if a user in this community explicitly identifies as younger than 18 years old.

We have reached out to the admins requesting for a modification to the rules if !autism@lemmy.world were to adjust its rules to accommodate the needs of 16 and 17 year-olds. While they were understanding, it seems that the necessary changes are not possible at the moment. Therefore, unless the ToS change, if anyone identifies themselves as younger than 18 years old on !autism@lemmy.world, we will have to report your account. We would hate for someone to get invested in this community, develop a bond, and then have it suddenly taken away. At the same time, we don’t want to jeopardize it by helping users violate terms and ultimately the trust we have with the admin team.

We appreciate your understanding and compliance with this matter.

!autism@lemmy.world Mods

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Now this is an interesting conundrum. Firstly, I get that their intention, but the wording of “use or access the website” is ambiguous. I’m a user on pawb.social, and could honestly have never used the website at all. Perhaps “create an account or directly interact with a lemmy.world user or community” might be better?

    What about the following situation:

    • I’m over 18 and have a mastodon account on furry.engineer which (apparently) doesn’t have any age restrictions.
    • I make a post there, and think it’s interesting enough for here so I CC in /c/autism, which causes it to be posted here.
    • Someone else on Mastodon sees my post and replies. In their profile they have their age listed as 17, and they have no idea what Lemmy even is.

    Nobody involved has broken any rules. Lemmy.world could remove the post or ban the user, but that brings up the question of how they get their account unbanned when they reach age?

    Of course, this is not /c/autism’s problem to solve, but I get the impression many people still think this is like Reddit when it really is something different with the whole “federation” angle.

    • mark@social.cool110.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      @BackOnMyBS @savvywolf With federation the only sensible way to deal with this is to use the precedent set by email.

      You don’t agree to any of Google’s ToS just by sending to a @gmail.com address, and if sending from a work address you certainly wouldn’t have the authority to bind the company. Of course Google can do what they want with their spam filter, including blocking everything from you.

      Following that the terms of lemmy.world have no relevance to external users, unless the admins decide to defederate. Even then there would still be direct delivery between other servers for followers, along with parent post fetching.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s why the fediverse is great. You can just move the community or users to a different instance with rules you agree with.

      I think LW is doing this because regulations in the US are getting wild as republicans freak out about kids learning stuff they don’t want them to. Solution: don’t use a US instance if you’re a kid.

      (IMO the whole thing is stupid, all it does is lock out kids from relatively safe space and end up on toxic places overseas. Lawmakers don’t understand the Internet, as usual)

      • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        As far as I can tell, lemmy.world isn’t a US instance and isn’t subject to US laws or politics.

        Their tos says “The website and the agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and the Republic of Finland Suomen.”

        • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thanks for pointing that out. I’m not familiar with those jurisdictions, but I’m a little surprised then. That’s what I would have expected from a US hosted site.