• Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not really. It’s mainly about gaining market dominance on a technology they think is the future. They’ll build them right next to the massive coal plant alongside a million other things they’re subsidizing.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Even if its not some altruistic reasons, they still are literally subsidizing this emissions reducing technology.

        Tho they are also going pretty ham on subsidizing renewable energy too.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          You won’t be saying that once the market crashes. You’ll realize that there are much better ways of spending that money. Like far more practical emissions reducing solutions.

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            How do subsidies=crash, and what are more effective emissions reductions solutions than renewable energy and electrifying transit?

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You’re better off spending it on stuff like mass transit and the like. It won’t just all disappear at some point in the future.