Had to supplement her $42,000 per year teacher salary with OF and made nearly $1 million in six months (almost 50 times as her salary) before the school caught wind of it and forced her to resign. Got a new job out of education and was fired five days later when they discovered news articles about her.

Edit: To those basically saying she had it coming because she made her OF account public…

  1. Sex work is real, valid work.
  2. There is nothing wrong with sex work. Sex-shaming is Puritanical horseshit.
  3. “But her students could find her OF!” is a problem their parents should have to solve. It is not her responsibility to use an alias, because of points 1 and 2.
  4. Every other argument criticizing her for her sex work during her non-teaching hours is fucking moot.
  • ji59@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 个月前

    They claim that I violated their social media policy, but will not respond to me with how I violated it.

    WTH is social media policy? Is it written somewhere that employees can’t have OF? (And also who found her on OF and snitch on her?)

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 个月前

      It’s probably some bullshit like “your social media presence cannot hurt the company” - i.e. if someone is a full on Nazi, clients could look them up and it being a controversy. But now it’s applied to OF by puritans.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 个月前

      I’m pretty sure that it would mean something like “employees shouldn’t post anything that embarrasses the employer”.

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 个月前

      Nearly all white collar employees are covered by a social media policy. We have social media training annually and have to sign a document saying we agree to a number of rules on our public accounts.