spoiler

moneyless socialist utopia

I mean, we all know that’s what it is, but I’m pretty sure that’s the first time they’ve said it straight out in universe. And then the plot reminds of it several times as that very thing is put in danger.

  • lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was more irked that she said the Federation did good throughout the Galaxy. The Federation has always been limited to this Quadrant. Romulans to the left of me, Klingons to the right. The entire premise of Voyager and DS9 was a wormhole to other parts of this galaxy, neither of which have taken place yet. Even the Borg have not spread to other Galaxies yet that I know of.

  • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    there were a couple of times on DS9 when Quark and Nog flippantly refer to the Federation in similar terms, but they’re quick, throwaway lines and easy to miss.

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What did they just imagine cash transactions happening on starships even when they said many times in every franchise that they have evolved past the need for money?

  • Reva@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Although I agree that the Federation should be conceptualized as a socialist state, I can’t help but think that the writers just threw it in there as a hip buzzword to engage Gen Z and make for a great marketing clip, even though they themselves probably think that “socialist” means “government welfare and being against discrimination of minorities”. The writing of the newer Trek series constantly contradicts the idea that the Federation has a moral high ground, let alone is an actually socialist society, or that there is any kind of political, let alone revolutionary ideal in the writing room other than “yass diversity”.