![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/8e1d8cc7-0593-466a-a904-de3b22bd4705.jpeg)
Evil if true
Evil if true
Interesting. Why is chrome faster than chromium? I thought chrome was chromium with bells and whistles.
The issue is… I think it’s gonna be hard to find a non-Nestle candy.
Exactly, the bottom 10% don’t have enough money, meaning that any money you give them will go towards consumption. The top bracket’s spending as % of income or wealth is tiny and is mostly independent of their income. Their money is spent on investments, not basic goods and services. They practically don’t affect inflation.
I think money should be printed during periods of low inflation. E.g. Japan could have benefited from that. After this bout is over, governments can return to printing, carefully.
Well, you can disagree without being angry. I in general think that anger is a liability, not an asset. It hinders debate and argumentation.
Ah, I was talking about the demand for commodities/services.
Either store that data yourself or rely on your servers to store it and distribute it, just like they do today.
Yeah, I know. It is possible to implement it though. Posts and comments are cached in every federated server, the only thing you need is attribution to the author. Your key/certificate could be your identity.
Nono, inflation is the right word. Inflation isn’t caused by the money supply, but by supply vs demand. If demand suddenly increases, there will be inflation. If a lot of money is printed and is thrown in a hole, money supply will increase, but there’ll be no inflation.
Seems that a chunk of this platform’s userbase are people generally angry at the establishment who upvote everything that wants to bring it down and downvote everything that rejects the idea. Happy that there’s many reasonable people here too :)
I already know I’m gonna be downvoted for this, but the top 1%/0.1% spending isn’t gonna change, whereas the bottom 10% will cause inflation… That’s why there’s no magic bullet.
Would be great to have identity independent from any particular servers…
And they say lightning doesn’t strike the same place twice. Wow! 😮😮😮
I think the main problem is that guys don’t understand what makes an attractive guy attractive. At least I don’t.
It’d be great to support identity based on a key hash, so that it’s completely decoupled from any instances. Maybe some time in the future.
I don’t want to upload anything. Why would they ever not allow that?
Yup, this is the worst thing about ProtonMail. They must patch this. Not being able to use my own GPG encryption when needed is crazy for a private & secure service.
Looks like my first time hearing about those is from them being removed