He’s a journalist, risks are part of his job…
He’s a journalist, risks are part of his job…
Well I’d argue it does nothing. In fact, it probably is counter productive, so instead of nothing it does the opposite
Oh shit, was it that easy to fix climate change? To vandalize heritage sites was all it took?
Well good! It’d be fucking travesty to permanently damage a world heritage
He says that the paintings are sensitive to damage, it’s in the quote, now stop wasting my time.
So? I never said it’s permanently damaged (sure fucking hope not) I said the archeologists where worried it had been.
Yes, it is, I just double-checked
Just stop, for once in your life, admit that you don’t know what you’re talking about, just this instance.
“They are sensitive and they are completely covered in prehistoric markings which remain to be fully studied,”
So the archeologists are worried but not you, since you, being the goddamn genius you are, are sure it’s all fine.
I don’t even know why I start these arguments with the all-knowing wizards on Lemmy.
Paint and ‘being outside’ are two very different things.
You slow or something?
Bullshit. It’s an archeological site. The now faded ancient paintings risks being ruined as a result of this idiocy.
As a one-party state governed by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, it was a flagship communist state.
In the summary of the article. 5 seconds this time. Still as waste of time if you can believe it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union?wprov=sfla1
That took me about 10 seconds
Some incredible fucking insight, especially as it goes against probably all historical literature we have on the subject.
And what’s is your source for all of this?
None of which any Communist state in history has achieved.
Wth are you talking about?
China isn’t Communist enough for you?
China is a Communist state…
The site is founded by Communists, it’s not odd at all.
Well fuck you too you nasty cunt
They got straight roads and everything!