*thank you for the anti-war.
France used nuclear to get fossil fuels <10% 40 years ago. Meanwhile, the US continued building more coal plants, that were only displaced by oil and natural gas in 2015.
*thank you for the anti-war.
France used nuclear to get fossil fuels <10% 40 years ago. Meanwhile, the US continued building more coal plants, that were only displaced by oil and natural gas in 2015.
Is anyone actually bothered by these guys? They do more to show people how liberal foreign policy is just imperialism than I do.
Decapitates pilots on ejection
Is that what the 2010ish conservatives who’d pass around jpegs of Michelle Obama, with wrinkles or shadows in clothes circled in mspaint, and go “That’s a penis!” evolved into?
Fewer people would be able to afford rent. Either the landlords would have to eat the cost, or sell.
Unless you’re talking about gas giants, then a bunch of that hydrogen can be metal too.
A plant doesn’t have to be native to benefit local ecosystem, parsley isn’t native, but there’s a local species of butterfly whose caterpillars love it.
They’re called steam traction engines.
It would be really funny if he took it up, and the republicans proceeded to block appointments until a conservative presidency.
The person who campaigned for Ronald Reagan has a dream blunt rotation?
OK yeah everyone knew the cops started shooting protesters, but the real mystery is who were the snipers shooting the riot cops.
The evacuation ones were basically impossible at 8+, I was shooting down 3/4 ships and we’d still get overrun.
Exactly, multiplayer, 3d FTL.
So there’s enough cheap enough utanium to go around and no need for the industry to recycle spent fuel.
That is where the supply and demand equation is right now. When the supply was lower before the 90s, the equation favored recycling, and if we build more plants to drive up price, it will favor it again.
Sure, if it was free to build, it would be better than not having them (though worse than more efficient types of storage), assuming the cost of refining the steel breaks even.
There’s a reason fossil fuel companies fund hydrogen.
As for reprocessing, storage is in competition with newly mined fuel. As mining becomes more expensive or nuclear demand increases, there’s greater impetus to recycle more fuel. Conversely, if there’s fewer plants consuming the fuel or more mines opening, recycling projects die.
The more plants close, the less waste you’re gonna get reprocessed.
Russia already has 40,000 nukes, they’re not a proliferation risk.
There’s both, there was a plant in Savanah Ga that was supposed to process nuclear weapons into fuel, but after they got the weapons, they stalled on building the plant.
There were other plans to build reprocessing facilities for old fuel in the US (or breeder reactors that can use them as is) that all died off after the fall of the USSR opened up kazakstan, tanking the price of Uranium.
That was post Fukushima, I just meant the coal expansion in the 80s and 90s was due to the decrease in nuclear; anti-nuclear during the 70s through 2000s was equivalent to being pro-coal