If you don’t immediately throw someone who doesn’t flush off of your property to never return, you’re nasty too.
If you don’t immediately throw someone who doesn’t flush off of your property to never return, you’re nasty too.
Discord supports threaded topic based formats as well.
The reality is that for a lot of interactions, a live chat feels better than a forum post. You can very easily do both on discord, though.
It’s not perfect, but the alternatives that aren’t a whole project by themselves building a tool don’t have feature parity, or the user base.
“Monitors” are smaller.
And the minimum cost of entry to anything reasonably sized is double to triple. Changing some settings is well worth it.
It’s really not.
In poor countries sure, but not the US or Europe. You will get sued and you will pay if you do that at any scale.
The courts aren’t. Nintendo is.
Emulation has already been litigated to hell and back. It’s very clearly legal, including relying on users pulling a blob or two from their hardware for the whole thing to function.
By existing. (Yes, that’s the only argument they made. There is no assertion that anyone associated with Yuzu “cracked” (not necessary) or actively distributed TOTK.)
It’s a distraction. It’s literally impossible for it to be relevant unless the yuzu project page hosted TOTK files.
No, it’s not.
The case Sony lost also relied on the end user having a blob of Sony’s code. A user using their own key and a blob of Nintendo’s firmware, which is the official stance of Yuzu on the correct way to do so, is exactly the same thing. There’s nothing new to be litigated. Every part of Yuzu is very clearly legal.
The fact that it was used to play a game before official release straight up cannot possibly be relevant. It’s a distraction. The project isn’t, and isn’t capable of being, responsible for anything but its own code.
Emulation has also been litigated to hell and is also very clearly legal.
Black flag, more ships/weapon paths, maybe some fleet commands for bigger battles, expand the shipping jobs thing to feel like you’re really commanding a fleet.
Or none of that and just call it a pirate game.
If it was actually like Black Flag I’d be all over it.
But it’s live service shit.
The other dumb part is that when their manufacturing capability does significantly improve, AMD will happily sell similar chips to other people. And Valve won’t care in the slightest. Because all they want is people on PC so they buy games, many of which are through steam.
Linux being relevant is a bigger benefit to them than any revenue from the deck, and they’ve already demonstrated that it’s capable of pretty much any game that doesn’t actively exclude it.
I’ve had decent experience with nobara with a 2080. I had a couple hiccups early, and had to reinstall basically right away, but after that it’s been solid.
I could see the benefit on a non-phone mobile device. Completely cutting power as a deep sleep without needing a lengthy boot sequence could be nice.
Unless it’s actually “just as fast” as volatile memory (including progress to the latter) and not more expensive, though, it seems like it wouldn’t justify the tradeoffs.
I mostly don’t play multiplayer, but some games just aren’t the same single player.
Madden, for example, the AI just is too complex for them to handle it at a high enough level for the balanced but competitive strategy game football can be. All Madden is hard, but it’s hard by cheating. Playing against humans is how you get the chess match. I’m sure there are various other genres focused on strategy that are similar. AI can beat advanced humans in clean games like chess or go, but probably not on a PS5 and not with messier strategy games.
If I put the over/under at 10x male pirate to female, are you taking the under?
lol sounds like Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher.
The limitation of both was still way more the awful CPU and HDDs, though, neither of which they addressed much in the updated versions.
There’s plenty of room to improve graphics. It won’t make the PS5 obsolete, because the core CPU/SSD is what matters, but that doesn’t mean they can’t or won’t make a better one.
I’ve definitely noticed the results suck ass, but this is a nice breakdown.
There are a bunch of free channels on the internet that some TVs can just stream without a dedicated app. These channels are supported by ads like cable/whatever channels, but not locked behind a subscription. VLC is supporting whatever formats they use to allow (or make it easier; IDK) people to watch them if they want.
The other part is that they’re working on web assembly to allow sites to use VLC as their embedded video player.