But you said “or even parts of Mexico”. Large numbers of components in a Tesla come from outside the US, including from Asia. Not a lot of brands are mass shipping vehicles from Asia to North America, instead they build them here. And source parts from suppliers that build factories nearby.
Rail is heavily used for shipping vehicles from manufacturers that put out large numbers, making it pretty economical and environmentally sensible to ship from Canada, Mexico, and many US states.
If you’re going to lie about your vehicles, you need to make it a massive lie.
Nissan leaf.
I have a note called Random that I use to drop content that doesn’t need to be in a note, it won’t live a long lifetime, just scratch pad stuff. That one gets an entry multiple times a day.
Otherwise it’s whatever note(s) I have for a currently running project. Parts list, decision notes, tests run and their status.
Looks like you got it. Nice.
They won’t make it to the US market certainly.
Yep, stupid dictate
Claiming hydrogen vehicle sales are booming is hilarious. I’m glad EVs are picking up on the last mile and short-range delivery vehicles though, which will make all kinds of environments better.
What he won’t support is them raising prices mostly for Nvidia. TSMC has done this in the past as a clear move to cut nuisance production, and nvidia’s books are full of nonsense orders that they can’t possibly fill. Wei isn’t an idiot, unless Nvidia fronts a lot of cash, it’s unlikely to work out in Jensen’s favor.
That’s why we’re still warming the planet at a damning rate, yes.
Rail still exists in a lot of the US, and around the world. It’s also less expensive to build and maintain new rail compared to highway lanes. And that’s before you include the externalities like deaths from brake dust, pollution from rubber dust, increased traffic, traffic fatalities, road delays, and so on.
Not a chance. Trains make infinitely more sense at that point.
I’m not trying to solve for anything except a unified connector. The upshot of which would be supporting all three phases of a three phase branch which is something that NACS mentions while only using two of the phases from a 480v system. Using all three means onboard chargers and connectors could be the same globally, and when using split phase power in north america, the onboard charger would still work completely fine but at a lower voltage.
Huge surprise, yeah. It’s funny how a little campaign contribution can go such a long way.
You realize SAE doesn’t need to do anything for a standard to exist?
Thank you for demonstrating for the class you don’t know what you’re talking about. You couldn’t even understand the tense in a blog post.
From the SAE page: North American Charging System It’s too bad you didn’t even look at your own link or you might have accidentally learned something. Also from the SAE J3400 page This Standard is currently a WIP.
Bye now.
Sure, but all of these companies have had Hydrogen programs. GM had hydrogen cars back in 2009 on the road. BMW’s hydrogen program is still going strong. Toyota was just smart enough to capture the incentive money while they could pretend it wasn’t a boondoggle. 😆
He successsfully got ByteDance to use US cloud providers to run their service. Specifically cloud providers whose CEOs donated to his campaign. It was smokescreen, and apparently people believed it.
Toyota makes hybrids, they outsell all other hybrid manufacturers, and middle-america “doesn’t want” electric vehicles while also demonstrating they don’t know about electric vehicles. Same story over the past decade, not too much has changed except the number of BEV on the road in total.
Toyota is a conservative (not the political kind) company, so it’s not that big a surprise.
Being wrong hurt you that much? That’s weird.