Some of those that work forces Are the same that burn crosses Uh!
Some of those that work forces Are the same that burn crosses Uh!
His parents were a GP and owned a pharmacy. They just didn’t get it for him/them for whatever reason.
They certainly could have afforded it if they wanted to.
There’s a massive difference between just not having something as a child and not even being able to afford it at all.
I love these Tory twat stories where they try to relate to normal people. They’re so far off the mark it highlights just how clueless they are about real life.
Cost. I think all of the 5th generation were top loaders. On the cd audio side nice stackable separates were tray or slot. Cheap stand-alones were top.
6th was a split but then I think the perception of slot or tray loading being more prestigious moved everyone to slot/tray.
Plus I think top loaders might have been less secure. I certainly remember a number of physical mods or swap techniques that defeated top loader security very easily.
Same thing happened with videos as well. Started with manual top loaders and then moved to slot.
Wah wah I’ve blown loads of money buying a dying social media brand and driving it into the ground.
Give me more money now or I won’t use my special money making powers to make this company more money.
Legal or not. Does anyone have any idea what these AI and robotics things, that only Elon holds and were developed by him completely separate to Tesla, are?
Oh my god that’s awful.
Nearly as bad as an agency that does that to their own people and that of another nation.
Not seeing a lot of similar articles about Shin Bet though. Wonder why…
You specifically said “electrons do not orbit with any kind of movement”
So by your own argument they’re not moving. We know the mass. So if we find one by your logic we know everything about it.
Yes that is the probability cloud model well done.
However my point again. You seem to think saying this renders the simile of planetary orbit obsolete. It doesn’t it’s a simile. It’s a way of explaining something that doesn’t have to exactly explain it.
If someone said “that fell on my head like a ton of bricks” would you go and examine the object and check it was exactly a ton of bricks or that it exactly exhibited the properties of a ton of bricks?
Or perhaps would you understand something from that about what had happened to them.
You may find this useful. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simile
Here’s an example. The thoughts of the 1966 world cup winning squad on the disappearance of Lord Lucan
This looks like something from Viz magazine. They’ll regularly have big one page jokes about something and then have these little made up side bits in.
Whole thing was probably about illegal immigrants taking small boats to the hundred acre wood and then there’s this little bit in the bottom.
If they don’t orbit with any kind of movement then what does that say about Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle?
We know their mass. So once observed we would know everything about them.
Unless your saying they just some how jump from one random point in that probability cloud to another?
Electrons do orbit like planets in the solar system however they’re also waves. Which is what gives the set radii they can orbit at and keeps it all stable. The orbits can and do change due to the emission or absorption of certain quanta of radiation.
So saying like is fine. It’s not an exact description but more of a simile to help understanding. They do orbit like a solar system. Saying electrons orbit the same as a solar system would be incorrect. That’s when the maths doesn’t work and the electrons orbit would decay.
The difference between this and No Man’s Sky is astounding.
No Man’s Sky arrives and is dog shit: Look we will fix this, we will get there.
Starfield arrives and is dog shit: This must be divisive because it’s different to what we normally do.
That’s very strange. On the recent earnings call the Muskinator said they were bringing forwards the release of new models.
Must have some genius way to do that without the new models team and a charging infrastructure.
Unless he’s just running round saying one thing and then making stupid decisions 2 minutes later. No past evidence of that though…
Anyone remember when he spent all his time talking about colonising mars? That was his big thing and the future. Whatever happened to that?
Then spacex got government funding. Now AI is the big thing.
I’ve still yet to see any of his great visions he’s actually delivered on.
We have sold 1/5 less cars. So we need 1/5 less workers.
And people were questioning if he was worth his enormous pay packet.
This is sad. The judge should have thrown him a treat once he did sit.
Reward the good behaviour or how else will Trump get house trained?
Hmmm I wonder if all the liability from their other ongoing lawsuits had anything to do with their quick recall this time🤔
Ah so it was the solidified constitution that made us the largest empire (by any measure) to have ever existed.
All those countries just invited us in to rule them because of that did they?
For those occasions when someone orders the top shelf ammo.
Also there’s actually 3 ladders there. One pair of steps and two small standard ladders.
I suspect the standard ladders are shite. So they carry some battered steps to avoid having to use them.
I have an ok machine and regularly use it.
I know a guy who works in the industry supplying machines and another who is a commercial roster. Both say similar things.
A good grinder and fresh beans are far more important. They both say the aeropress is an excellent way to brew and better than most cheaper espresso machines.
My advice based on that would be. Keep using the aeropress but if you want an upgrade get a good burr grinder.
That’s if your ultimate aim is making better coffee. If you just want to get better using a machine and have fun just pick one you like the look of and enjoy.
That would only be because they are the only other large party. So for the majority of people/constituencies they are the best alternative if you want to vote to get the Tories out.
All they are doing is comparing the voting at the last general election, polling and then using that two give an option for the best way to vote them out.
Not sure what pro labour facts you think are on there