So, I was reading the article on the PSL and I noticed that there “Controversy” section had a different bias compared to the rest of the article. The article on Maupin also has an anti-PSL bias. Can ProleWiki come to a consensus on the PSL rather than having competing biases on the PSL article?
This is the Maupin article:
https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Caleb_Maupin
There doesn’t seem to be much editorializing here. Do you disagree that there were allegations of abuse?
The “instantly jumped to” part seems non-neutral and unnecessary.
I’ll give you that, but that seems to be a mark against Maupin, not really PSL
True enough.
I don’t know much about the abuse subject, it just seems that some parts of ProleWiki are calling the PSL an ML org and others say it’s right-deviationist
Ah, ok. Is it the bit that calls Brian Becker a right wing entryist? I don’t know much about him.
Yee
All I know about Becker is he has a decent podcast and PCUSA hates him because he won’t join the red-brown alliance or uncritically support Russia.