• rhacer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This relationship can be saved as long as the guy’s wife does not start expressing an interest in Emacs. That would, of course, put an end to the relationship, but if she’s one of those “Notepad is all I need” types, there is hope this can be worked through.

          • Hexarei@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I went helix -> vim -> emacs -> kakoune -> neovim, super interesting to see how people’s experiences differ

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You made me look up helix again after a few years and it’s gotten pretty sick actually. I might main it for a while to see how it fairs. It’s fairly similar to kakoune of course, but it’ll take a while to get all the modes into my muscle memory. The similar actions are in different modes and there are many more modes in helix as far as I can tell. But it’s cool, looking forward to experimenting.

  • Crow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    3 months ago

    “nothing fancy” that’s the issue, just some jumping won’t impress her; you gotta do the real crazy shit. Friggin “wife not impressed by my cooking? I make a hard boiled egg and she isn’t impressed”

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    “See if you just learn these 87 simple keyboard shortcuts, you won’t need to simply drag with the mouse and cut and paste at all!”

  • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    As someone who’s been a software developer for over a decade and in IT even longer, I still don’t use vi/vim for anything other than when crontabs have it set as the editor.

    • Hexarei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly if you don’t use vim motions in your ide of choice, you’re missing out big time. Being able to do things like “Delete everything inside these parentheses”. di( or “wrap this line and the two lines below r in a pair of {}” ys2j{ , or “swap this parameter with the next one” cxia]a. with a single shortcut is game changing.

      Even just being able to repeat an action a number of times is ridiculously useful. I use relative line numbers, so I can see how many lines away a target is and just go “I need to move down 17 lines” and hit 17j.

      Absolutely insane how much quicker it is too do stuff with vim motions than ctrl-shift-arrows and the like

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s really neat, but I don’t think I do that often enough to really make the performance hit of learning a whole new thing and memorizing keyboard shortcuts and commands worth it. I don’t find myself refactoring code a ton, especially after moving to a more TDD-like model.

        • Hexarei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s less about refactoring and more about navigation of your code while editing. Ever wanted to delete a single word? daw deletes the word your cursor is currently in. How about "copy everything up to (but not including) the nearest “D” on the current line? yfD.

          The whole point is that editing code in the middle of writing it, not just refactoring it, is immensely faster.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Absolutely insane how much quicker it is too do stuff with vim motions than ctrl-shift-arrows and the like

        Those tasks are a very small part of work time, so most people don’t feel the need to optimize it.

  • olafurp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m sorry but your wife won’t be impressed by basic vim motions. You need to learn some more advanced motions to get her wet.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    I refuse to see how vim and emacs is worth learning. I only use it because that’s the only option when editing server files. Beyond this, I couldn’t imagine coding in these environments from scratch.

    • Hexarei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      The biggest benefit of (neo)vim is the motions.

      Honestly if you don’t use vim motions in your ide of choice, you’re missing out big time. Being able to do things like “Delete everything inside these parentheses”. di( or “wrap this line and the two lines below in a pair of {}” ys2j{ , or “swap this parameter with the next one” cxia]a. with a single shortcut is game changing.

      Even just being able to repeat an action a number of times is ridiculously useful. I use relative line numbers, so I can see how many lines away a target is and just go “I need to move down 17 lines” and hit 17j.

      Absolutely insane how much quicker it is too do stuff with vim motions than ctrl-shift-arrows and the like.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly those things just don’t sound like common enough actions to be worth shaving 0.5 seconds off. How often do you know exactly how many lines to move a line by? And how often do you even need to move a line that far?

        I still don’t buy it.

        • pearable@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 months ago

          Relative lines means each line except the one your cursor is on is relative to your current line. Like this:

          5 5k jumps here

          4

          3

          2

          1

          6 your cursor is here

          1

          2

          3

          4

          5

          6

          7

          8 8j jumps here

          The main reason I like it is I don’t like mouse ergonomics. Keeping my hands on the keyboard just feels better

          • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes I understood that. My point is how often do you know you need to move a line exactly 17 lines? Do you count them? Clearly much slower than doing it interactively by holding down ctrl-shift-down for a bit.

            • pearable@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I just look at the line number. If the code I want to edit is 17 lines up there’s a 17 next to it. My ide window looks like my comment. Normally an ide would look like this

              1

              2

              3

              4

              5

              6

              7

              8

              9

              10

              11

              • lunarul@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                As a vim user myself, I don’t understand why you need relative lines either. I can just as easily type :23 to go to line 23.

                • pearable@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Mostly a matter of taste I think. One benefit is one less key press since relative keys shouldn’t need to press enter at the end of the command. I mostly use it because it came default with LazyVim.

              • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Line numbers are absolute, not relative (normally anyway; I think some editors allow showing relative line numbers). Anyway I think holding down (page) up/down is going to be just as fast.

                • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  There are both modes for absolute and relative line numbers in vim. Holding up/down might be intuitive nd easy to remember, but saving 1 second everytime you need to do this can add up pretty fast

        • Hexarei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not “move the current line of code”, but instead “jump the cursor a number of lines”

          • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh so like page up/down then? Not exactly showing the raw power of Vim when you can use an existing key press! 😄

            • Hexarei@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I can’t tell if you’re trolling; Page up and page down are different from “I need to jump 10 lines down” with 10j. Or 11 lines with 11j. Or “Delete the line I’m on and the six below it” with d6j.

              • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                They’re not significantly different. Maybe it takes you 1s and me 2s. Not worth the effort of learning. Especially because Vim comes with significant downsides compared to full IDEs that will make you slower overall.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Being able to do things like “Delete everything inside these parentheses”. di( or “wrap this line and the two lines below in a pair of {}” ys2j{ , or “swap this parameter with the next one” cxia]a. with a single shortcut is game changing.

        Those are handy, but most IDEs make at least the second two easy to do without reaching for the mouse (not sure about the first one), and for most people the other conveniences offered by IDEs are pretty attractive. I do use vim when I’m working in the terminal though, because it’s solid and handles large files better than anything else I know.

        • Hexarei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have most of the features of an IDE in my neovim config; name a feature and there’s almost certainly a plugin for it!

          Those are just a few small examples. One of my favorite things that vim enables for me is working with text objects. Things like functions, variables, classes, conditionals, paramters… Etc. Any action works with any text object - Want to jump to the next function in the file? Copy everything inside of a conditional? Cut everything up to (but not including) the nearest capital D on the line? Delete just the word your cursor is in the middle of (and one of the spaces around it)? Delete the current line and the N lines below it?

          The motions make editing code incredibly fast, and I still have modern features like variable completion, copilot, intellisense, ‘jump to definition’, “hover” information, fuzzy search in project… Name a feature. I highly recommend giving it a closer look for stuff like that.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            That does sound pretty good, and all without an IDE that hangs several times a day too. I haven’t really taken advantage of vim’s power.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly if you don’t use vim motions in your ide of choice, you’re missing out big time. Being able to do things like “Delete everything inside these parentheses”. di( or “wrap this line and the two lines below in a pair of {}” ys2j{ , or “swap this parameter with the next one” cxia]a. with a single shortcut is game changing.

        I read things like this and feel like I do a different type of coding than everyone else does. I’m not generating code at this speed.

        • niemcycle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah exactly this, the main bottleneck when writing code is either reading the existing code or thinking about how I want to implement some logic, not how I move my cursor and writing the code itself.

      • shalva97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        For me that’s not how it works. there is no way to escape mouse. People use Jira, Figma, Charles, lots of different software that just doesn’t have support for Vim like keys.

        Vim is good at editing a single file at a time. In my case I do like 95% reading and 5% editing. Most of the time there are bugs to fix, in a day I might read 20-30 files and change 5 lines in 5 different files.

        now add one more detail. None of my coworkers know Vim so when I ask for help I need to make sure I turn Vim shortcuts otherwise they won’t be able to help.

        you can go on GitHub on any repo and press . you will get vscode in your browser. Did same with my server and after that I just never want to look at Vim. If I have to use cli then I will install micro editor

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Feel it’s worth noting that ys[motion][symbol] is a plugin (vim-surround or nvim-surround at your option) and most IDEs therefore don’t support it

        Also as for plugins, Tim Pope’s vim-argumentative is another one I love. “Swap this parameter with the next one” is >, and “swap this parameter with the previous” is <,

        • Hexarei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah right, I forget that that one is from vim-surround. Though I know some ides do support somewhat custom vim-configs!

          I didn’t know about argumentative, my swapping is powered by Tree-Sitter

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I learned vim in college when I needed to edit files over ssh. It’s incredibly impressive as far as cli editors go, but I just don’t see how it’s more productive than a well set up ide with hotkeys.

      • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I barely know Vim, I’m an Emacs guy. Every time I pair with a colleague using an IDE, I find myself having to exercise great restraint, and not complain about how slow and fussy everything they do is. When I’ve worked with skilled vimmers, I have to admit that they invoke the deep magic nearly as efficiently as I do. Hotkeys? Pshaw, child’s play.

      • bignate31@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        it’s just reliable. especially with remote work, everything is “over ssh”, and you can create a very consistent environment with only a few config files

        the amount of AI you can get into these IDEs is impressive, though. probably the only reason I’d ever make the switch

      • Hexarei@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most of the productivity comes from the motions; Being able to jump around the text incredibly fast, combining motions with actions and repeats, it’s unparalleled in the sheer speed. I can delete an entire function with the same basic pattern Id use to delete a word.

        daf -> Delete the current function my cursor is on daw -> Delete the current word d3af -> Delete the next three functions

        Stuff like that, but with everything

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I only use it because that’s the only option when editing server files.

      suggestion 1: use nano. Unlike vi(m) and emacs, it’s meant for humans, all the command shortcuts you can execute are listed at the bottom.

      suggestion 2: browse the servers in question via your file explorer (sftp://user@server or just sftp://server) of choice or WinSCP if you’re on windows, open whatever file with your local graphical text editor of choice.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        My hardcore old IT dudes mocked me once like, “why install Nano? Vim is right there.”

        And I had to explain to them that I don’t live in the terminal.

        They didn’t install Nano and I spent 5x longer trying to get the settings correct in Vim.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      By the way, for editing server files consider nano. It’s also widely available, has simpler shortcuts and displays them on the screen. It’s obviously not powerful like vim, but a good match when you just need to edit a config file.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nano is just as fiddly as vim and way less powerful when you actually figure out what you’re doing though?

        Ie a completely redundant piece of software that has no place being pre-installed anywhere

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Where “intuitive” means “shows important shortcuts on the bottom of the screen”.

            It’s sufficient as a basic text editor, in the sense that it allows me to edit configuration.nix to include helix (a couple of years ago, nvim) without having to learn it because the commands to save and quit are, as said, displayed on the bottom of the screen. That’s about the extent of nano’s feature set, anyway, it’s a text editor, and a simple one as that, doesn’t even try to be a code editor.

            When it comes to actually being intuitive though I vastly prefer the old DOS-style editors. The editor that shipped with it, as well as the likes of Turbo Pascal. “Press and release alt to get to the menu bar” type of interface: It allows you to have an at least half-way adequate feature set without requiring people to learn shortcuts. If Turbo Pascal displayed all its functions and their shortcuts at the bottom it’d take up more than half of the screen.

            Really, “intuitive” when it comes to UI generally means “dumbed down, featureless”. Once a program actually has features things quickly become complicated and it’s counter-productive to keep things usable for users which aren’t willing to set at least a modicum amount of time aside to learn the very basics. The Blender Fundamentals series is what two hours of video. Text editors can get away with less as the feature set isn’t as broad but you should be willing to go through at least half of of the tutorial which is going to take 15 minutes or so, both for vimtutor and hx --tutor.

          • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I just find the saving mechanism frustrating to use compared to vim’s as an entry level user, and now as a mid-skilled user I dislike how featureless nano is - when I was first learning how to use the terminal I hated having to edit anything as I was pretty much force-fed nano with no alternative provided, but on finding vim and remembering literally 3 things (:w, :q and i) everything became so much easier, but I definitely do have an extra bitter taste left about not being told about something much easier to use which irked me when I saw someone preaching how amazing nano is

            I also really don’t get the hate for vim when remembering 3 things gives you as much/more functionality as nano and is a starting point for so much more functionality - intuitive doesn’t mean featureless and don’t try and pretend nano’s shortcuts are the same as 99% of other editors (text or otherwise), in fact they’re totally different, making it less intuitive

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nano is perfectly fine for me.

      But I know the basics of vim if I need to use it.

      • Zo0@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have a cheatsheet of all the necessary vim shortcuts!

        :q!

        • Iapar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          :q looks like a person which jaw hit the desk. Which adequately described me when I found out how to exit vim.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I refuse to see how vim and emacs is worth learning.

      Interesting choice of words. You aren’t unable to see…you refuse to. Why would you refuse knowledge?

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because I’ve followed tutorials and watched plenty of videos on vim and it’s not worth the steep learning curve compared to the gui text editors I’m familiar with.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Stop showing off VIM to your wife would be a good start. I mean, I would do the same if she tried to show off her make tutorials to me.

  • XTL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Realising that your partner doesn’t care about you after 10+ years can indeed be hard.

  • 0x01@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Guy shoulda tried emacs instead, wife is probably an elitist